top of page
Description

Sending Well: Lessons from the Church of Antioch

By Mike Easton

This resource provides guidance for a four-part Bible study that explores the church of Antioch in Acts 11–15, offering an in-depth example of a sending church. Designed for personal study or group discussion, it helps church leaders identify important patterns and principles for sending well—rooted in worship, generosity, discernment, perseverance, sound doctrine, and grace. Each section includes Scripture reading, commentary, reflection questions, and prayer prompts.



One of the first exercises that Upstream loves to provide for church leaders is an overview of the church of Antioch in Acts 11–15. It can be of great benefit to thoroughly study how Antioch provides a rich early church view into sending well. While we would love for you to experience this study in one of our cohorts, we also wanted to provide a resource for you to do it on your own—both for personal reflection and also for leading others. 


How to Use This Study


This resource includes four readings from Acts 11–15, each highlighting a key moment in the life of the church at Antioch. For each reading, you’ll find:

  • Commentary – guiding insights drawn from the passage and its context.

  • Reflection & Discussion – questions to help you apply what you see to your own church and context.

  • Prayer – simple prompts for prayerfully responding to what you’ve learned.


You can work through one reading each session, or gather a small group of church leaders, missions team members, or missionary partners to discuss them together. Each session stands alone, but they build on one another to form a fuller picture of how God worked through this sending church.

Interpreting and Applying Acts


Before jumping in, it’s helpful to remember some good hermeneutical practices when reading the Book of Acts. Acts is primarily narrative—which means it’s mostly descriptive, not prescriptive. While some passages in Scripture give explicit commands to obey, Acts gives us stories to observe. These stories reveal models, patterns, and themes that show how the gospel advances, rather than strict formulas we must copy.


Luke’s purpose in writing Acts was not to provide a rulebook or even a complete history of the early church. Rather, his goal was to show the unstoppable movement of the gospel as it spread outward through the power of the Holy Spirit. The narrative of Acts reminds us that the gospel moves in many different ways and through many different people. It ultimately points us to God as the chief shepherd of his church—the One who leads, empowers, and sustains those who take the good news to those who have never heard.


Biblical scholars Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart offer three helpful principles for interpreting Acts and discerning whether a passage should be viewed as descriptive or prescriptive:

  1. It is probably never valid to use an analogy based on biblical precedent to give biblical authority to present-day actions.

  2. Biblical narratives can have illustrative and “pattern value,” even if it may not have been the author’s primary purpose.

  3. Regarding Christian experience and practice, biblical precedents may be considered repeatable patterns, even if they aren’t normative. But it is moot to argue all Christians must repeat the pattern or they are disobeying God’s Word.


The purpose of this study, then, is not to create rules to follow but to observe repeatable patterns of how God worked in and through the church at Antioch. Acts gives us examples to learn from and emulate—patterns that inspire, not burdens that constrain. When we imitate the early church’s faith and posture, we participate in the same Spirit-led movement that continues to spread the gospel today.

How wonderful it is that God formed Scripture this way! Knowing that believers from every tribe, tongue, and nation would one day have to read and apply these stories in their own unique contexts, God masterfully inspired human writers to communicate his glory, his beauty, and his ways.


Now, let’s join in that historical and global practice.


Session 1 – Acts 11:19–30

Theme: The Birth of a Sending Church


Commentary


Here, Luke sets the story of the church at Antioch. The gospel movement began as believers scattered following the persecution of Stephen. What looked like tragedy became the spark that spread the good news far and wide. The gospel blossomed not through a coordinated effort but through the faithfulness of ordinary believers who shared Christ as they went.


When Barnabas was sent from Jerusalem to shepherd this movement, he quickly saw that the work was too great for one person. He sought out Saul (later Paul) to help him teach and guide the church. For a full year they shepherded the believers, and the movement grew so strong that outsiders gave them a new name—Christians.


In verses 27–30, the Antioch church faced its first major opportunity to respond to a need beyond itself. When prophets from Jerusalem reported a coming famine, the believers decided to act. They brought the need before the whole church and allowed everyone to give as the Lord led. It’s a repeatable pattern worth noticing: needs are made known to the body, and the people of God respond in generosity.

For church leaders today, this can feel complicated in a world filled with constant news and requests for help. Yet the principle remains—the church must create space for its members to respond to genuine needs. And the people of God are called to give joyfully, “not reluctantly or under compulsion,” as Paul later wrote in 2 Corinthians 9.


The way the Antioch believers gave is as remarkable as what they gave. In their day there were no wire transfers or charitable receipts. Sending a large gift to another city required trusted messengers who would hand-deliver it, at personal cost and risk.


Who did they send? Paul and Barnabas. These were no ordinary members; they were the church’s key leaders. Every time I read this passage, I can’t help thinking, Surely there was someone else available to carry the money! But the Antioch believers knew the stakes. They chose people of proven character—men full of integrity and courage—because the work was worth their best.


The result is a powerful glimpse into a church that was both deeply rooted in teaching and quick to act in generosity. Antioch reminds us that a sending church doesn’t just send missionaries—it sends compassion, faith, and trust, even when the path requires sacrifice.


Reflection & Discussion


Use these questions for personal meditation or group conversation.


1. What does this passage teach us about the sending God?

  • How do you see God working through circumstances of suffering and scattering (v. 19)?

  • What does God’s initiative in this story reveal about his mission?


2. What does it teach us about the sending church?

  • What patterns do you notice in how Antioch responds to need and opportunity?

  • In what ways does the Antioch church model both discernment and action?


3. What does it teach us about the church’s sent ones?

  • What does Paul and Barnabas’s willingness to deliver the gift reveal about the heart of those who are sent?

  • Why might integrity and sacrifice be essential qualities in those we send today?


4. What does it teach us to apply in our own context?

  • What needs—local or global—should be placed before our congregation for prayer and generosity?

  • What would it look like to send our best people to meet needs, not merely our extra resources?


Prayer


Spend time thanking God for turning hardship into gospel opportunity. Pray for a heart of generosity in your church and for wisdom to recognize Spirit-led needs to which you should respond. Ask God to raise up trustworthy men and women who can be sent with confidence for the sake of his kingdom.


Session 2 – Acts 12:25-13:5

Theme: The Church and the Spirit Send Together


Commentary


The story of Antioch’s faith didn’t end with their generosity in Acts 11. There (v. 26) we were told that Barnabas and Saul taught together for a year, though some scholars estimate even more time elapsed before the events of Acts 13 (around AD 48). During that time, Paul and Barnabas became beloved leaders, teaching and shepherding the growing church.


Alongside Saul and Barnabas are listed three other prophets and teachers who were leaders within the Antioch church. Under their leadership they were fasting and praying. Acts doesn’t give us a particular reason why they were worshiping and fasting; it was likely a normal rhythm of the church. Were they specifically meeting at this time to pray about sending out Saul and Barnabas? The Scripture doesn’t say. But a repeatable pattern to emulate seems clear: worship and seek the Lord together.


During that time, the Holy Spirit spoke clearly: “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” We don’t know how the Spirit made this known—whether through a unified impression, an audible voice, or some other means—but we do see the church’s response. They continued fasting and praying, then laid hands on Paul and Barnabas and sent them out.


This laying on of hands symbolized both recognition and participation. The church publicly affirmed God’s call and united itself to the mission through prayer and commissioning. For those sent, this moment would be an anchor in times of hardship—a reminder that their calling wasn’t self-generated but discerned and confirmed within their community.


A common question arises from this passage: Who did the sending—the Holy Spirit or the church? Upstream’s The Sending Church Defined answers this way:


The pattern for this is presented most clearly in Barnabas and Paul’s commissioning by the church at Antioch in Acts 13:1-4. As the church leaders were praying and fasting together, the Holy Spirit commanded them, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Paul for the work to which I have called them” (v. 2). It’s important to note in verse 3 that the church “sent them off,” while in verse 4 they were “sent out by the Holy Spirit.” 

So, which was it? We are tempted to answer “both” only with the disclaimer that the Holy Spirit primarily sent them, while the church secondarily sent, or merely affirmed the Spirit’s sending. Yet that conclusion fails to acknowledge how the Holy Spirit works through the church that he embodies. As Paul explains, “In [Christ] you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit” (Ephesians 2:22). It’s not the Spirit doing the main work of sending and the church filling in the gaps; rather, the Spirit works through the church as both entities work collectively to send.

Finally, verse 5 introduces a third figure: John Mark. He accompanied Saul and Barnabas as an assistant, though his story reminds us that not all sending unfolds perfectly. John Mark soon turned back (v. 13), and later his early departure would cause sharp conflict between Paul and Barnabas. Yet this same John Mark later matured into a faithful minister, author of the Gospel of Mark, and a companion whom Paul would eventually call “useful to me” (2 Tim. 4:11).


Even the exemplary church at Antioch wasn’t perfect in sending. Not every missionary story ends in long-term success. But God is not finished with those who return home, and the church must not give up on them either. The Spirit continues to restore and send again.


Reflection & Discussion


1. What does this passage teach us about the sending God?

  • How does the Spirit’s initiative shape the church’s actions?

  • What does this passage reveal about God’s partnership with his people in mission?


2. What does it teach us about the sending church?

  • How does Antioch’s rhythm of worship, prayer, and fasting prepare it for obedience?

  • What do you notice about the church’s role in recognizing and affirming calling?


3. What does it teach us about the church’s sent ones?

  • What can we learn from Barnabas and Paul’s submission to the Spirit and the church?

  • How does John Mark’s story encourage patience and grace toward those who struggle on the field?


4. What does it teach us to apply in our own context?

  • How could our church strengthen its practices of fasting, praying, and commissioning?

  • How might we ensure that sending is both Spirit-led and church-affirmed?


Prayer 


Pray for a Spirit-led posture in your own ministry and church. Ask for humility to listen when the Spirit speaks and for courage to send out your best people. Thank God that his grace restores and re-commissions those who stumble along the way.


Session 3 – Acts 14:21–28

Theme: The Church Sends Out and Receives Back


Commentary


At the close of Paul and Barnabas’s first missionary journey, Luke summarizes their work in just a few verses. What he describes is not a formula to copy exactly, but a pattern worth learning from—a picture of what faithful missionary work looks like in any generation.


Paul and Barnabas:

  • Shared the gospel in every town they visited,

  • Made disciples of those who believed,

  • Returned to those same places to strengthen the disciples,

  • Taught perseverance in the face of hardship,

  • Appointed elders in every church,

  • Prayed and fasted over them, entrusting them to the Lord.


Few passages in Scripture capture the essence of missions more clearly. These verses can serve as a guiding framework for anyone involved in cross-cultural ministry. For new missionaries, they provide a foundation. For seasoned workers and sending churches, they offer a way to realign priorities around what matters most: gospel proclamation, disciple-making, leadership development, church planting, and dependence on God through it all.


When the work was complete, Paul and Barnabas returned to Antioch, the church that had originally commended them to the grace of God for this mission. Notice what they did upon returning (vv. 27–28):

  • They gathered the church together,

  • They shared all that God had done among the nations,

  • They spent “no little time” with the disciples.


Their journey began with the church and ended with the church. The sending community was not a minor detail—it was central from beginning to end.

This pattern continues to speak powerfully to churches today. First, Antioch had invested deeply in these missionaries—through prayer, leadership, and likely financial support. By gathering to hear their report, the church could see the fruit of its partnership and be stirred to continue giving and sending.


Second, the church itself needed these stories. Testimonies from the field rekindled their faith and reminded them of God’s heart for the nations. Without such reminders, global mission easily drifts to the margins of church life. Churches must keep the work of their sent ones visible and celebrated, ensuring that mission remains part of the congregation’s shared imagination.


Finally, missionaries need encouragement. Paul and Barnabas’s journey was marked by danger and opposition—conflict with sorcerers, angry crowds, even an attempted stoning. No wonder Luke says they spent “no little time” with the disciples when they returned. They needed rest, fellowship, and renewal.


That pattern continues today. Every missionary—whether returning after decades or after a difficult short-term season—needs the loving welcome and spiritual refreshment of their sending church. And churches, in turn, are strengthened when they hear firsthand how God is at work around the world.


The story of Antioch reminds us: sending doesn’t end when someone departs. It continues when they return.


Reflection & Discussion


1. What does this passage teach us about the sending God?

  • How do you see God’s faithfulness and sovereignty throughout Paul and Barnabas’s journey?

  • What does it reveal about God’s heart for perseverance and partnership?


2. What does it teach us about the sending church?

  • What practices do you see in Antioch’s role before and after the journey?

  • How does your church view the responsibility of welcoming back and debriefing sent ones?


3. What does it teach us about the church’s sent ones?

  • What do Paul and Barnabas’s actions at the end of their journey reveal about humility and accountability?

  • Why might it be vital for missionaries to share stories and spend time with their sending church after returning?


4. What does it teach us to apply in my/our own context?

  • How can our church better celebrate and learn from our missionaries?

  • What rhythms could we build to refresh and restore returning workers?


Prayer

  • Pray for endurance for missionaries serving in difficult places. Ask God to help your church to be a place of refreshment and celebration for those who return.



Session 4 – Acts 15:1–5, 30–41

Theme: The Sending Church Stands Firm


Commentary


After Paul and Barnabas’s first missionary journey, the church at Antioch faced new challenges. The same community that had once sent these leaders out now became the setting for theological tension and relational strain—reminders that even a vibrant sending church is not without weakness.


In verses 1–5, certain men came from Judea teaching that Gentile believers needed to be circumcised to be saved. This teaching struck at the heart of the gospel itself. Luke tells us that “Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and debate with them,” and the matter was deemed important enough to be brought before the apostles and elders in Jerusalem.


In other words, Antioch became the catalyst for what would soon be known as the Jerusalem Council. The church recognized that the gospel of grace was too precious to compromise, and it sent trusted leaders to work through the issue with wisdom and unity.


Later, after the council reached its Spirit-led conclusion (vv. 6–29), Paul and Barnabas, along with Judas and Silas, were sent back to Antioch to deliver the letter affirming that salvation was by grace through faith alone. Once again, Antioch was both a sender and a receiver—a church willing to listen, to learn, and to align itself with God’s truth.


But the chapter closes with a painful moment. Paul and Barnabas, once united on mission, found themselves divided over John Mark. Barnabas wanted to give him another chance; Paul did not. Their disagreement was so sharp that they parted ways—Barnabas taking Mark to Cyprus, and Paul taking Silas through Syria and Cilicia.


It’s a sobering ending. Yet even here, the providence of God shines through. The result was not the end of sending but an expansion of it. Two missionary teams now went out instead of one. The churches were strengthened, and God used even human conflict to advance his purposes.


The story of Antioch ends much as it began—with God using imperfect people to accomplish his perfect plan. The church was not without failure. It sent John Mark too soon. It faced false teaching. It couldn’t even keep its two leading missionaries together. Yet through all this, God’s Spirit continued to work, refining both the church and its leaders.


The lesson is clear: the health of a sending church isn’t measured by the absence of conflict or difficulty, but by its dependence on God’s grace in the midst of them. The same Spirit who empowered Antioch to send also sustained it through testing, teaching the church to trust that God can redeem even its missteps for the good of his global mission.


Reflection & Discussion


1. What does this passage teach us about the sending God?

  • How does God demonstrate his sovereignty and grace even in conflict and disagreement?

  • What does this teach us about his ability to use imperfect people and circumstances to multiply his mission?


2. What does it teach us about the sending church?

  • How did Antioch handle theological controversy and relational tension?

  • What can your church learn from Antioch’s humility to seek counsel among other local churches and believers?


3. What does it teach us about the church’s sent ones?

  • How do Paul and Barnabas’s actions remind us that missionaries are human too?

  • What do we learn from John Mark’s story about failure, redemption, and continued usefulness?


4. What does it teach us to apply in my/our own context?

  • How can our church handle disagreements or mistakes in sending with grace and honesty?

  • How can our church stay theologically grounded in the midst of the ever-changing complexities of global missions?


Prayer


Thank God that he works through imperfect people and imperfect churches. Pray for humility and unity in your own church when conflict arises. Ask the Spirit to give your leaders discernment and courage to protect the gospel of grace.






The God Who Still Sends Through Us


The church at Antioch stands as a remarkable picture of a sending church. They were far from perfect—they likely sent John Mark too soon, faced false teaching, and could not reconcile even their own leaders, Paul and Barnabas. Yet through this imperfect community, God carried out some of the most significant missionary endeavors in history.


The same Spirit who worked in and through Antioch is at work in the church today. He still empowers ordinary believers, still calls and sends, and still sustains those who go. Every local church that depends on the Spirit shares in this same story—a story of the gospel moving outward in generosity, love, and perseverance.


As you finish this study, take courage in what God has already done through his people, and take hope in what he can still do through yours. May we send our people out with prayer and preparation, and with the deep confidence that the Spirit who began this work in Antioch continues it through us—for the glory of Christ among all nations.



Next Steps


The journey toward sending well happens one step at a time. Here are three ways you can continue learning and applying Scripture in your church:


  1. Gather a group of leaders from your church and walk through Acts 11-15. Gather observations, make interpretations, and come up with applicable steps for your church.

  2. Based on your personal (or group’s) in-depth study of Acts 11-15, create a presentation that highlights your key insights and applications. You can then use this as a teaching tool. 

  3. In order to experience a study of Acts 11-15 among other church missions leaders, consider joining Upstream’s Sending Church Elements Cohort. 


Description
bottom of page