The Collective Sending Potential of Smaller Churches

THIS ARTICLE IS BY ZACH BRADLEY, DIRECTOR OF CONTENT STRATEGY

The discussion of the sending church may cause some leaders and churches to feel left out. Many of the churches touted as sending churches are large and well-resourced. Why not leave sending up to them, along with missions agencies? It’s a question we will want to answer in order to tap into an oft ignored yet deep well of sending potential. By smaller we mean any church that isnt multi-campus or multi-thousand. That could be a roomful of people with no staff, a mid-sized church of several hundred with a growing staff, and everything in between.

Luke Holmes (@lukeholmes) is the pastor of First Baptist Church of Tishomingo, Oklahoma. Never heard of it? No surprise. Neither had Luke, even as a native of nearby Oklahoma City. That is, until six years ago when he and his family made the transition to the community of 3500. That meant bidding farewell to his large church back home for First Baptist’s 100-member congregation. Why in the world would he do such a thing, especially with all today’s hype about big cities and hipster churches? The answer came with a shout:

Have a heart for small churches!

Smaller Churches Have Unique Potential

Okay, so maybe it wasn’t shouted. But it oozed so much from Luke’s story that the phrase is emboldened and underlined at the top of my notes. His heart for small churches didn’t just land him in one, it helped him stay in one. “You can cross a culture within a language group,” he said, referring to the lightyears between Oklahoma City and Tishomingo. But that doesn’t mean Luke downgraded. Instead, he’s enjoyed the unique blessings of a smaller context, especially as it relates to mission. Here are some of them:

  • Relationships – “Smaller churches are much more relational. Everyone is involved because everyone knows one another. They support their own. Someone they’ve seen grow up is a huge incentive to stay connected when they’re on the field. And it’s that much sweeter because it’s intergenerational.”
  • Unity – “In a smaller church it’s easier to capture the whole church’s heart for a particular place and people. Casting a single vision builds unified prayer and involvement. This is especially beneficial for children because it gives them a simple, clear vision of the church on mission.”
  • Agility – “This is the key to revitalizing struggling churches. It helps them remember who God has made them to be. It’s a much smaller ship to turn than larger churches. Smaller means more agile! Getting people overseas really helps make this happen. If you can get three members overseas, it really starts to change things.”
  • Measurability – “It’s a joy as a pastor to watch your people focus outward.” Pastors in smaller churches can often more easily be directly involved in practically leading their congregations into mission. They literally get to be there as change takes place in the people they know so well.

Common Speed Bumps for Smaller Churches

Luke also admitted there are a number of challenges facing smaller churches. They aren’t road blocks, but more like speed bumps that require God’s grace and wisdom on the way to becoming sending churches. And they are well worth navigating. Some of them include:

  • Tradition – “At first it can be hard to drum up passion and get the ball rolling. People are slower to adapt to change. For decades missions what was other people did. Changing that can be difficult.”
  • Demographics – “Many smaller churches are in blue-collar communities. The businesses and schools in town don’t have overseas offices or opportunities. That means it can be challenging to pay for going on trips or supporting sent ones. And that also means it’s hard to take off work to go themselves.”
  • Hesitation – “In smaller communities there is a natural skittishness toward other cultures and overseas trips.” This can be especially hard when family members aren’t supportive of someone’s desire to go. It can even cause tension in the church.
  • Interest – “Smaller churches aren’t fed by seminaries like many larger churches. We just don’t have tons of people who want to be sent.” Anyone raised up with a sense of calling to cross-cultural mission most likely must come from the ranks of the faithful few.

Including Smaller Churches Combines Influence

Luke pointed out why small churches often get overlooked individually. “We naturally gravitate toward more potential—large churches can send more.” Yet if smaller churches were faithful to send one missionary well, together they would easily surpass the sending of a few larger churches.

But this isn’t just a numbers game. Sending must not merely be an issue of quantity, but quality. And if thousands of qualified missionaries are to be sent, it will take partnerships between large and small churches.

“There can be dissonance between large and small churches because of sheep-stealing, but they should still initiate partnership. For example, it would be helpful for smaller churches to be able to participate in larger churches’ mission trips. It’s just hard for smaller churches to plan all the administrative details of such trips. Joining in with a larger church can help their members catch a vision and begin to build excitement in the rest of the body.”

It only takes a brief conversation with smaller church pastors like Luke to remember just how much Jesus loves his entire body, even the “less presentable” (1 Corinthians 12:23)—or less headlining—parts of it. Because every church is connected to “the head of the body” (Colossians 1:18), smaller churches have a serious role to play in God’s mission. “It takes us more time,” Luke said. “Give us time instead of counting us out.”

In other words, have a heart for smaller churches!